I started this blog, at least, in part, to document my political predictions, such as my prediction that Mitt Romney wouldn't seek reelection in Massachusetts. Or my July 2000 prediction that Joe Lieberman would be picked as the VP nominee, a prediction you'll just have to trust me on.
Now, the NY Times seems to be stealing my line on the real estate craze. In an article today the Old Grey Lady echos my theme connecting the run up in home prices to the run up in stock prices five years ago:
Real estate-crazed Americans have started behaving in ways that eerily recall the stock market obsession of the late 1990's.
In Naples, Fla., some houses have been bought twice in a single day, an early-21st-century version of day trading. Buying stocks on margin has morphed into buying homes with no money down. The over-the-top parties of Internet start-ups have been replaced by flashy gatherings where developers pitch condos to eager buyers.
It looks like the Harvard MBA's are buying into it, too, oh-so-self confidently buying into the greater fool theory.
Even at Harvard Business School, where students have traditionally gravitated to careers in investment banking and corporate marketing, real estate is suddenly hot. About 25 graduates have taken real estate jobs in each of the last two years, up from only six in 2001.
It is not quite the gold rush of 2000, when about 200 Harvard M.B.A. graduates flocked to technology companies. But even if they are not working in real estate, some of those graduates are now investing in it.
Andrew Farquharson, a member of the class of 1999, said he recently teamed up with a high school friend to buy a home in the Central Valley of California "out of pure speculation." He knows of other classmates who have made similar investments.
Then again I and the Times could be wrong, but that's what the delete key is for.
(Article updated 4/9/05).